Qatar Official's Diplomatic Immunity Sparks Debate

The diplomatic immunity granted to a Qatar Embassy official after he breached security on a Denver-bound plane has sparked debate nationwide about how the United States treats law-breaking, foreign diplomats.

Mohammed al Modadi, 27, joked about setting his shoes on fire after he was caught sneaking a smoke in the bathroom of United Airlines Flight 663 Wednesday. Modadi's sarcastic remark caused a military scramble; two F-16 fighter jets were deployed as a security measure to escort the flight, which made an emergency landing.

The Transportation Security Administration requested that an alert be sent to all of the airplanes in the sky.

"Attention all aircraft, this is an advisory. Be advised, a U.S. air carrier has reported a passenger has attempted to ignite his shoes on fire," said the alert, which went out after Flight 663 was on the ground. "All pilots are to maintain extra vigilance and report any anomalies immediately to ATC [air traffic control towers]."

The plane was met by the FBI and local law enforcement. Even President Obama received a report.

The Qatari government relieved Modadi of his plum assignment but he won't suffer any consequences at the hands of the U.S. government because of his diplomatic immunity, which has caused outrage among many.

Critics have lashed out on airwaves and the Internet. Some are calling for the Qatari government to reimburse the cost of handling the bomb scare. It costs taxpayers an estimated $7,500 per hour in fuel and maintenance expenses for each fighter jet, according to the North American Aerospace Defense Command.

But the State Department has said that the United States has no plans to ask Qatar for reimbursement.

Former Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said diplomatic immunity is legally appropriate but doesn't give diplomats a free pass to misbehave.

"Diplomatic immunity is centuries old, and it's actually quite important to protect, say, American diplomats who have to work in dangerous countries," Burns said. "Diplomatic immunity does not give you the right, as [former Supreme Court justice] Oliver Wendell Holmes once said, to yell fire in a crowded theater. You are supposed to observe the laws and customs of the country to which you are accredited."

The laws for diplomatic immunity were formally implemented in 1961 to protect diplomats from capricious governments or in times of hostilities. But it often stirs controversy.

U.N. diplomats owe the city of New York nearly $18 million in parking tickets. Several years ago, the United States had to release a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates accused of child molestation.

"In a situation like this ... you're really relying upon the good will of the others to make sure that they do everything they can to correct the abuse or to hold someone responsible if a crime is being committed," Burns said. "If someone is involved in a traffic accident or if someone is involved in a criminal offense, you expect that other country to make sure that that person pays for that crime."

The United States itself has taken some heat abroad for protecting its diplomats. Romanians are still angry about the death of a popular singer killed in a car accident by a U.S. Marine stationed at the U.S. Embassy. The U.S. government refuses to lift his immunity.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...